All modules

    Module 2.3.3 · Phase 2 Decision · Step 2.3 Bias Identification & PrioritizationCore

    Explainability (XAI)

    Why did the model decide this, and where does a gap between groups come from?

    Answers why a model made a decision and where a gap between groups comes from.

    Open in the platform
    A prism. Point at it.

    What it does

    You connect a model and data, or open a Pulse or Fairness Navigator run, to see feature drivers, the group gap split by feature with proxies flagged, recourse and reliability checks. Each result is shown for the data subject, the board, the auditor or the engineer.

    Why it matters

    This step identifies and classifies concrete bias mechanisms affecting the system and prioritizes them based on impact, severity, and feasibility of mitigation. It focuses attention on the most material sources of unfairness, preventing diffuse or unfocused intervention efforts.

    Step 2.3, Bias Identification, in the Decision phase.

    Where it sits

    1. 2.1Fairness Definition
    2. 2.2Populations & Intersections
    3. 2.3Bias Identification & Prioritization
    4. 2.4Metrics & Thresholds

    How to use it

    In the Fairness Navigator Beta

    Work through the steps in order. Several modules open from the Navigator's steps and hand their results back.

    On its own Live

    Open 2.3.3 from the platform's Modules page and run it when your project needs it. Work is saved with the assessment.

    After a Pulse reading Live

    Start with a fast first read, then go deeper with the modules where it points.